• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

A resource site for investors, brokers, academics and the media.


Building a fiduciary culture of honesty, integrity, and expertise.

  • About
    • Fiduciary Law
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors*
    • Chairman’s Council
    • Real Fiduciary™ Practices Board
  • Real Fiduciary™
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Investors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Advisor Registry
      • Why You Need a Real Fiduciary™ Advisor
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Advisors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Affirmation Program
      • Real Fiduciary™ Background
  • Fiduciary September
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
  • Frankel Prize
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Programs
    • Leadership Through Fiduciary Program
    • “Raise Your Voice” Campaign
    • SEC Conduct Standards Rulemaking
    • Institute Initiatives & News
    • Personal Financial Planning Program Webinars
    • Prior Programs
      • Advisor On My Side
      • No Incidental Investor Initiative
      • Bogle Legacy Forum
        • Bogle Forum
        • Bogle Book
      • August 11th 2015
  • Research
    • Academic Papers
    • Legislation and Rulemaking
    • White Papers
    • Op-Ed Commentary
  • Jack Bogle

Why Advisors Should Watch Obama’s State of the Union Speech

By Knut Rostad on January 27, 2014

thinkadvisor250

 

Originally published on ThinkAdvisor.com, January 27, 2014

By Knut Rostad

Tuesday night President Obama delivers his State of the Union speech. Advisors should take note. Not just for the themes the President strikes or economic policies he advances, but for discerning who is listening. For example, will any of your clients tune in, listen and care about what the President has to say?

This is not some abstract civics question; this is a lesson that bears directly on advisors. The President is engulfed in public skepticism. Likewise, fairly or not, investors’ widespread distrust of Wall Street bleeds discredit on all financial services, including advisors.

For advisors who question the direct relevance of Wall Street’s bad behavior and fraudulent deeds, consider the parallels with and public stature of Washington. Then consider the analysis of Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan, a writer not prone to loud cable TV punditry.

In her Saturday Journal piece, Noonan makes the case that Americans have stopped listening to the President. She cites his recent speech on the National Security Agency when he spoke on this “bitterly contested issue.” She writes, “Pew Research found half of those polled didn’t notice. National Journal’s Dustin Volz wrote that Americans greeted the speech with ‘collective indifference and broad skepticism’. Of the 1 in 10 who followed it, more than 70% doubted his proposals would help protect privacy.”

Noonan says (no surprise here) the “bigger problem” for the President Tuesday night is Obamacare. She recites its widely reported and well-known deficiencies. But then, in zeroing in on what’s important about Obamacare, she takes a different tact compared to the more common establishment or partisan narratives.

She doesn’t talk about a “botched roll out” or website calamities or that no one’s been held accountable, or that “healthy 30 something’s” will sign up, when they get around to it… These points may well be true and part of the Obamacare story, but are they the story?

The mild mannered conservative makes two pointed statements. First, “The program was passed only with the aid of a giant lie. Now everyone knows if you liked your plan, your doctor, your deductible, you can’t keep them.” She then concludes, “When the central domestic fact of your presidency was a fraud, people won’t listen to you anymore.”

Some may suggest Noonan’s words are harsh or partisan. (After all, she’s a former Reagan speechwriter.) She says the President is implicit in “a giant lie” and “a fraud.” Ouch. But is this harsh? How about asking: are her statements true and accurate and important. The record suggests “yes” on all three counts.

Noonan’s analysis is relevant to advisors regarding their own clients as well as potential clients and investors generally. Distrust has consequences. Potential clients—as well as many clients—are too often skeptical or tuned out and turned off when advisors speak.

Advisor Ron Carson’s recent Peak Advisor Conference featured a session where investors reacted to a series of recorded advisor pitches regarding their services and fee structures.As David Armstrong of WealthManagement.com reports, these client-centric pitches failed terribly in connecting effectively with these investors.

Further, Noonan’s candor and honesty may resonate with investors in part because in Washington these traits seem to be in short supply. Consider how the fiduciary issue has been transformed in Washington. Well-established understandings of securities law and industry practices have been turned on their head by aggressive lobbying by the securities and insurance industries.

In this upside-down view (one that many policymakers seem to support), ‘40 Act fiduciary duties would gravely harm brokerage clients. Accordingly, brokers who advise clients while legally obliged to represent manufacturers can best serve investors. Furthermore, they argue that conflicted advice from sales representatives benefits investors and such conflicted advice should not be limited or avoided but encouraged.

Accordingly, in this upside-down view simply advocating that investment advice should be fiduciary advice—that all advisors should represent investors like medical doctors represent patients—just doesn’t cut it in Washington.

Watch the President deliver his State of the Union. Consider how your clients react and look for coverage that has ordinary voters reacting. (Try to avoid most pundits.) There will be an important message here for advisors’regarding moving forward with the fiduciary standard.

 

Dan Moisand

 

Dan Moisand is a nationally recognized fiduciary fee-only financial planner, an Institute Real Fiduciary™ Advisor and Chair-elect of the CFP Board.

The Institute has enshrined the ‘Moisand Rule’ on fiduciary practices. It is basic and is more important today than ever: “You have to avoid conflicts. If I avoid a conflict, I don’t worry about it.”

Watch the video of Moisand speaking here.

Bob Veres

 

Bob Veres is a long term observer of financial planning. His Newsletter, “Inside information” Is a staple of leading planners. In the May edition he writes about fiduciary and the Institute.

"But a much bigger point is that the fiduciary standard—as Knut Rostad of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard has pointed out—has been determined by the Supreme Court (1963 ruling) to be at the very heart of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It is the foundation of what it means to be an RIA registered with the SEC instead of a tipster or a tout."

- Bob Veres, Parting Thoughts ... The SEC's Own Compliance Culture

  • Contact

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 · Web Design by Milkweed Web