• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

A resource site for investors, brokers, academics and the media.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Building a fiduciary culture of honesty, integrity, and expertise.

  • About
    • Fiduciary Law
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors*
    • Chairman’s Council
    • Real Fiduciary™ Practices
  • Real Fiduciary™ for Investors
    • Why You Need a Real Fiduciary™ Advisor
    • Real Fiduciary™ Advisor Registry
  • Real Fiduciary™ for Advisors
    • Real Fiduciary™ Affirmation Program
      • Real Fiduciary™ Background
  • Fiduciary September
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
  • Frankel Prize
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Programs
    • Leadership Through Fiduciary Program
    • “Raise Your Voice” Campaign
    • SEC Conduct Standards Rulemaking
    • Institute Initiatives & News
    • Personal Financial Planning Program Webinars
    • Prior Programs
      • Bogle Legacy Forum
        • Bogle Forum
        • Bogle Book
      • August 11th 2015
  • Research
    • Academic Papers
    • Legislation and Rulemaking
    • White Papers
    • Op-Ed Commentary
  • Jack Bogle’s Legacy
You are here: Home / Knut's Views / WEALTH TALK America: Focus On Regulation Best Interest

WEALTH TALK America: Focus On Regulation Best Interest

By Knut Rostad on August 4, 2020

This conversation originally appeared on Family Wealth Report on July 31.

As part of Family Wealth Report’s series of Wealth Talk videos, we speak to a prominent US wealth management industry figure about the Regulation Best Interest legislation, and why he is concerned about how it will not improve fiduciary standards, as framers claim.

The sweeping new set of rules on US wealth management known as Regulation Best Interest are controversial. Last June, the US Security and Exchange Commission supported the Regulation Best Interest rule, and supported other actions to improve disclosures and clarify advisors’ responsibilities. The rules follow a failed attempt by the Department of Labor to enact a fiduciary rule that would have introduced a “best interest” test of how financial advice is provided. However, senior wealth management industry figures have criticized the SEC rule as diverging form the existing fiduciary standard required of registered investment advisors. 

One such critic is Knut Rostad, who is president at Institute for the Fiduciary Standard. He also wrote about the issue at Family Wealth Report on July 15. We have run this discussion as an audio-only podcast.

Fiduciary Doings

Tamar Frankel and Phyllis Borzi

 

The Institute organized a meeting to discuss common interests on Reg BI, the states and advocacy on January 16 in Washington. 22 leaders from nine advisor and consumer advocacy organizations attended.

Here, Phyllis Borzi (left) and Tamar Frankel, Institute Board of Advisor members, are seen readying to depart an Institute dinner, the evening before, where they led discussions.

Carolyn McClanahan

 

"With the advent of 401(k)s and the decimation of pension plans to ensure financial security in old age, a fiduciary standard is more important than ever. The public needs to be confidant that advisors helping them plan for their retirement years always and only act in their best interest as a fiduciary. I'm happy to endorse organizations such as the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard that promote protections for those who need to secure their financial future."

  • Contact

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 · Web Design by Milkweed Web