• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

A resource site for investors, brokers, academics and the media.


Building a fiduciary culture of honesty, integrity, and expertise.

  • About
    • Fiduciary Law
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors*
    • Chairman’s Council
    • Real Fiduciary™ Practices Board
  • Real Fiduciary™
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Investors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Advisor Registry
      • Why You Need a Real Fiduciary™ Advisor
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Advisors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Affirmation Program
      • Real Fiduciary™ Background
  • Fiduciary September
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
  • Frankel Prize
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Programs
    • Leadership Through Fiduciary Program
    • “Raise Your Voice” Campaign
    • SEC Conduct Standards Rulemaking
    • Institute Initiatives & News
    • Personal Financial Planning Program Webinars
    • Prior Programs
      • Advisor On My Side
      • No Incidental Investor Initiative
      • Bogle Legacy Forum
        • Bogle Forum
        • Bogle Book
      • August 11th 2015
  • Research
    • Academic Papers
    • Legislation and Rulemaking
    • White Papers
    • Op-Ed Commentary
  • Jack Bogle

Harold Evensky to SEC: “CHANGE THE DAMN NAME” of Regulation Best Interest

By Knut Rostad on March 1, 2021

Evensky, financial and investment advice pioneer, author and professor, urges SEC to rename the Reg BI, ‘New Suitability’

Download a .PDF of the news release here.

Washington DC, March 1, 2021 – On the eve of the March 2 Senate confirmation hearing of Gary Gensler to serve as chairman of the Securities & Exchange Commission, a prominent financial advisor urges the new SEC to change the name of the new broker-dealer rule, Reg BI.

Evensky explains his rationale in social media posts (attached) by the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard, “Reg BI is no best interest standard. Fiduciary is.” Reg BI’s name is “Grossly misleading.”

Evensky’s recommendation is one of several recommendations to the SEC in an Institute paper (linked below) released January 27.

Knut A Rostad, president of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard, noted that “Renaming Reg BI raises basic issues about broker-dealers’ identity. Here are two. First, Commissioners Kara Stein and Hester Peirce both offered alternative names for Reg BI and raise the question, ‘What’s reasonable.’ The SEC’s own REG BI guidance, notes ‘Broker-dealers are also prohibited from making misleading statements.’” (Reg BI final rule, p. 445).

Second, the SEC states it facilitates “Greater clarity for retail investors.” (Proposed rule, p. 21600 of Federal Register). Should “greater clarity” include an affirmative duty of broker-dealers to disclose their primary business of product distribution? Is it possible this is not “material information?”  

“It’s simple. Don’t say you do something you don’t do.”

Evensky is not alone among investing and fiduciary experts in his concerns. Roger C. Gibson, CFA, Founding Partner, Gibson Capital, LLC, notes, “It is simple. Don’t say you do something you don’t do.  If you don’t put clients’ best interest first, don’t say you meet a best interest fiduciary standard.”

Tamar Frankel, professor emerita, Boston University School of Law, reminds advisers and regulators how important the fiduciary standard is. “The most effective way to destroy any healthy and lasting economy and financial system is to relieve intermediaries of a duty to be trustworthy. That means to relieve them of the obligation to do what they promise to do for the benefit of their clients.”

Separately, Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger puts a finer point  on Frankel’s warning

Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway used a choice word of his own, completely separate from this Institute initiative, that put a finer point on Frankel’s warning. Munger, in his criticism of Robinhood reported February 26 by the WSJ, called out Robinhood’s defense of its practices as “bullshit.”      

Institute paper highlights key fixes for June 2019 SEC rulemaking   

An Institute January 27 paper by Knut A. Rostad, Ron Rhoades, Brian Hamburger* identifies fixes the SEC should make to Reg BI.

Fixing Defects Paper Summary. The SEC June 2019 rulemaking on conduct standards is as significant as it is fundamentally misguided. The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard has identified five recommendations that would have a critical impact on raising standards to better serve and finally level with investors:

  • Rebrand Reg BI as a ‘New Suitability’ standard for broker-dealers; affirm broker-dealer product recommendations are distinct from best-interest fiduciary advice;
  • Strengthen broker-dealer ‘New Suitability’ standard by eliminating certain conflicts;
  • Provide new guidance and clarity for the broker-dealer standard of conduct;
  • Mandate disclosure in Form CRS to express the stark differences between fiduciary advice and product sales and test such language with consumers; exempt registrants if disclosure is also contained in other disclosure statements.
  • For the Advisers Act, conflicts of interest that inherently violate the client’s best interest must be avoided; disclosure alone is insufficient. Further, strengthen the application of the Advisers Act’s fiduciary standard through guidance on state common law.

Download a .PDF of the news release here.

Dan Moisand

 

Dan Moisand is a nationally recognized fiduciary fee-only financial planner, an Institute Real Fiduciary™ Advisor and Chair-elect of the CFP Board.

The Institute has enshrined the ‘Moisand Rule’ on fiduciary practices. It is basic and is more important today than ever: “You have to avoid conflicts. If I avoid a conflict, I don’t worry about it.”

Watch the video of Moisand speaking here.

Bob Veres

 

Bob Veres is a long term observer of financial planning. His Newsletter, “Inside information” Is a staple of leading planners. In the May edition he writes about fiduciary and the Institute.

"But a much bigger point is that the fiduciary standard—as Knut Rostad of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard has pointed out—has been determined by the Supreme Court (1963 ruling) to be at the very heart of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It is the foundation of what it means to be an RIA registered with the SEC instead of a tipster or a tout."

- Bob Veres, Parting Thoughts ... The SEC's Own Compliance Culture

  • Contact

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2023 · Web Design by Milkweed Web