This article originally appeared on WealthManagement.com by Patrick Donachie.
Investor protection advocates want the Securities and Exchange Commission to revisit and revise its Form Customer Relationship Summary (CRS), the disclosure document implemented alongside Regulation Best Interest last year.
Knut Rostad, the founder of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard, presented an alternate version of the Form CRS that investor advocates, during a panel discussion hosted by the institute, argued would more starkly draw the distinction between investment advisors and broker/dealers.
“The research and data is clear and extensive that disclosure alone isn’t sufficient to protect investors from harmful conflicts of interest that may result from investment recommendations,” Phyllis Borzi, the former assistant secretary of the Labor Department, said during the virtual panel. “But since the SEC has built its entire regulatory structure around disclosure, the least it could do is make this mandated disclosure simple and understandable. In that respect, it’s failed.”
Earlier this year, Rostad and the institute urged SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and the SEC to make “major repairs” to Reg BI itself, claiming there was an inherent conflict when using the term “best interest” when describing the relationship between a broker/dealer and a client.
Rostad acknowledged that a Reg BI overhaul would require a lengthy, onerous process of new rulemaking but argued that a simple revision of Form CRS would not.
“There’s some genuine difference of opinion of where the wire’s tripped in terms of starting new rulemaking, as opposed to what does not trip that same wire,” Rostad said. “The Form CRS by itself, I think, was treated quite differently in the rulemaking than was the gist, the rationale and the result of Reg BI itself.”
Despite their misgivings about the current disclosure mandates, Rostad believed the new Biden administration and the new composition of the five-member commission offered investor protection supporters an opportunity.
“I think you’ve got to go back 25 years before you find a commission as attuned to investor protection and interest as we see now in the three Democratic commissioners,” he said.
. . .
