• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

A resource site for investors, brokers, academics and the media.


Building a fiduciary culture of honesty, integrity, and expertise.

  • About
    • Fiduciary Law
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors*
    • Chairman’s Council
    • Real Fiduciary™ Practices Board
  • Real Fiduciary™
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Investors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Advisor Registry
      • Why You Need a Real Fiduciary™ Advisor
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Advisors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Affirmation Program
      • Real Fiduciary™ Background
  • Fiduciary September
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
  • Frankel Prize
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Programs
    • Leadership Through Fiduciary Program
    • “Raise Your Voice” Campaign
    • SEC Conduct Standards Rulemaking
    • Institute Initiatives & News
    • Personal Financial Planning Program Webinars
    • Prior Programs
      • Advisor On My Side
      • No Incidental Investor Initiative
      • Bogle Legacy Forum
        • Bogle Forum
        • Bogle Book
      • August 11th 2015
  • Research
    • Academic Papers
    • Legislation and Rulemaking
    • White Papers
    • Op-Ed Commentary
  • Jack Bogle
  • DOL 2023

Investigative Report of Northwestern Mutual by Financial Planning Wins Award

By The Institute on May 12, 2021

Tobias Salinger’s 2020 article “A Question of Conflict” won a SABEW award in the Personal Finance category

Tobias Salinger, a senior editor for Financial Planning, made a very important contribution in 2020 that advanced the debate about fiduciary standards. Salinger interviews several financial planners who left Northwestern Mutual (NWM) because they believed the incentive structure and culture at NWM prevented them from being autonomous, fiduciary advisors.

The Institute recently posed four interview questions to Salinger in a quick Q/A:

Q: What got you interested in this story?

A: Advisors and other wealth management industry professionals began raising concerns a couple of years ago relating to integrated pay grids at Northwestern Mutual.

Q: How did you deal with the risks of the he said / she said aspects, where Northwestern does not look good?

A: There are often elements of it. All you can do as a journalist is try to engage and put the most compelling arguments out there from as many angles as possible in order to let the readers decide. I was grateful to Northwestern for engaging with our questions which helps a great deal on this front. I also wanted to emphasize that these are industry-wide matters and not just about one firm.

Q: What were you hoping would be the outcome of the piece for advisors, firms or other journalists?

A: I hoped to move all of the debate around fiduciary standards forward or, at least, help more advisors, wealth management professionals and clients better understand all of the issues involved.

Q: How well do you think the piece succeeded?

A: Judging by comments from readers, I think we succeeded a great deal. I knew that if we could bring a human face to the issue through advisors who care for their clients like beloved family members then we had a very good chance of being successful. It’s a much more effective way of telling the story than simply covering the rules promulgation process or looking at potential legislation.

– Interview between Institute and Tobias Salinger, May 12, 2021

Rick Scheeler, an advisory board member of the Institute, stated in the FP article that an amendment to his NWM contract “creat[ed] an inherent conflict of interest” and that it was “a massive insult” to his “primary occupation of financial planning and wealth management.”

This type of journalism is not only bold—it breaks new ground. Financial Planning’s investigation into NWM’s business practices, replete with perspectives on all sides of the issue, shine an important light on the difference between “advice” which is incidental to product sales and unbiased and disinterested financial advice. Hearing the stories of former NWM representatives who now have their own practices offers a unique window into the distinctions between sales and advice. Congratulations on a courageous, well-written article, Financial Planning.

Read the full, award-winning article at FinancialPlanning.com.

Dan Moisand

 

Dan Moisand is a nationally recognized fiduciary fee-only financial planner, an Institute Real Fiduciary™ Advisor and Chair-elect of the CFP Board.

The Institute has enshrined the ‘Moisand Rule’ on fiduciary practices. It is basic and is more important today than ever: “You have to avoid conflicts. If I avoid a conflict, I don’t worry about it.”

Watch the video of Moisand speaking here.

Bob Veres

 

Bob Veres is a long term observer of financial planning. His Newsletter, “Inside information” Is a staple of leading planners. In the May edition he writes about fiduciary and the Institute.

"But a much bigger point is that the fiduciary standard—as Knut Rostad of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard has pointed out—has been determined by the Supreme Court (1963 ruling) to be at the very heart of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It is the foundation of what it means to be an RIA registered with the SEC instead of a tipster or a tout."

- Bob Veres, Parting Thoughts ... The SEC's Own Compliance Culture

  • Contact

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Web Design by Milkweed Web