• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

The Institute for the Fiduciary Standard

A resource site for investors, brokers, academics and the media.


Building a fiduciary culture of honesty, integrity, and expertise.

  • About
    • Fiduciary Law
    • Board of Directors
    • Board of Advisors*
    • Chairman’s Council
    • Real Fiduciary™ Practices Board
  • Real Fiduciary™
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Investors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Advisor Registry
      • Why You Need a Real Fiduciary™ Advisor
    • Real Fiduciary™ for Advisors
      • Real Fiduciary™ Affirmation Program
      • Real Fiduciary™ Background
  • Fiduciary September
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
  • Frankel Prize
    • 2024
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
  • Programs
    • Leadership Through Fiduciary Program
    • “Raise Your Voice” Campaign
    • SEC Conduct Standards Rulemaking
    • Institute Initiatives & News
    • Personal Financial Planning Program Webinars
    • Prior Programs
      • Advisor On My Side
      • No Incidental Investor Initiative
      • Bogle Legacy Forum
        • Bogle Forum
        • Bogle Book
      • August 11th 2015
  • Research
    • Academic Papers
    • Legislation and Rulemaking
    • White Papers
    • Op-Ed Commentary
  • Jack Bogle
  • DOL 2023

Blog

Fiduciary Reference – Analysis of Investment Fiduciary Issues

By Knut Rostad on April 16, 2013

The SEC March 1 Release* assumptions about a possible uniform fiduciary standard and the duty of loyalty sharply restrict when fiduciary duties are applied. If these assumptions are adopted in rulemaking, fiduciary duties would effectively be removed for brokers and advisers giving investment advice to retail investors.

SEC Chairman Mary Jo White’s First Investor Protection Test: Will She Opt for FINO Over the Authentic Fiduciary Standard?

By Knut Rostad on April 16, 2013

By Knut Rostad Editor’s Note: This article represents a condensed version of the Institute’s newly released white paper on the March 1 SEC release (PDF). Mary Jo White has a clear opportunity to kick off her leadership at the SEC with a strong signal on investor protection. The Chairman can express support for the requirements […]

SEC Release Seeks Additional Information on a “Possible” Uniform Fiduciary Standard

By Knut Rostad on March 6, 2013

The Institute applauds the Commission for seeking additional data and information regarding the costs and benefits of broker dealers putting the best interests of investors first. The important purpose of this release, however, is overshadowed by certain discussions on fiduciary duty. One such discussion concerns the duty of loyalty in a “possible” * uniform fiduciary […]

What Fiduciaries Should Be Reminded By Valentines Day

By Knut Rostad on February 15, 2013

Three years ago, for Valentines Day, NYT personal finance writer Tara Siegel Bernard wrote a column, “Will you be my Fiduciary?” and discussed how investors might engage a fiduciary advisor. Bernard’s headline was clever enough, but is there is any logical link between one’s Valentine and one’s fiduciary? Not at first sight. The romantic spirit of Valentines Day, […]

Laby: ’40 Act Enacted to separate conflicted “tipster organizations” from genuine investment advisors

By Knut Rostad on February 3, 2013

Key report, “Emphasized that an adviser cannot provide unbiased advice unless conflicts of interest were removed.” Over the past several years, scholar Arthur Laby has been one of the most prolific researchers on the fiduciary duties of advisers and the meaning of the suitability standard of brokers-dealers. In his most recent law review article, Selling […]

Forbes Opinion Piece Discussing Institute Blog Gets SIFMA Response

By Knut Rostad on January 21, 2013

SIFMA affirms uniform standard must be “no less stringent” than ’40 Act John Wasik, a Forbes columnist, wrote a piece (published here) discussing Knut Rostad’s blog, “Four More Years?”  Wasik’s piece attracted a response from SIFMA (highlighted here in part) that, though including some misunderstandings that can be easily cleared up, is encouraging. It is […]

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
  • Page 74
  • Page 75
  • Page 76
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 81
  • Go to Next Page »

Dan Moisand

 

Dan Moisand is a nationally recognized fiduciary fee-only financial planner, an Institute Real Fiduciary™ Advisor and Chair-elect of the CFP Board.

The Institute has enshrined the ‘Moisand Rule’ on fiduciary practices. It is basic and is more important today than ever: “You have to avoid conflicts. If I avoid a conflict, I don’t worry about it.”

Watch the video of Moisand speaking here.

Bob Veres

 

Bob Veres is a long term observer of financial planning. His Newsletter, “Inside information” Is a staple of leading planners. In the May edition he writes about fiduciary and the Institute.

"But a much bigger point is that the fiduciary standard—as Knut Rostad of the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard has pointed out—has been determined by the Supreme Court (1963 ruling) to be at the very heart of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It is the foundation of what it means to be an RIA registered with the SEC instead of a tipster or a tout."

- Bob Veres, Parting Thoughts ... The SEC's Own Compliance Culture

  • Contact

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2025 · Web Design by Milkweed Web